“中国企业管理案例与质性研究论坛（2012）”
暨“第六届中国人民大学管理论坛”

中国人民大学商学院·《管理世界》杂志

2012 年 11 月 9 - 11 日

中国•北京

重要学术报告—超级豪华阵容，不容错过！

主题报告1 （中文）

论有同情心的学术：我们为什么要关爱（On Compassionate Scholarship: Why Should We Care）？

报告人：徐淑英教授，第67 届美国管理学会主席，和中国管理研究国际学会创会主席 （Anne S. Tsui, 67th President of the Academy of Management and Founding President, IACMR）

摘要Abstract： This presentation is about the role of compassion in business and management research. Professor Tsui will begin with presenting some facts about suffering in our societies, then go on to an analysis of increasing instances of compassion, including corporate compassion, and some exciting research on the positive results and benefits of caring. She then turns her attention to us, members of the management research profession and ask the question of “What does compassion mean for us? Why should we care?” The presentation will end with a challenge to all management researchers to take up the challenging of engaging in more compassionate research and less dispassionate research because the worth of scholarship has to be proved by its service to society.

报告人简介Biography： ANNE S TSUI is the Motorola Professor of International Management Emerita, Arizona State University and Distinguished Visiting Professor of Peking University, Fudan University, and Shanghai Jiao Tong University. She is the recipient of the ASQ, AMJ and JOM best paper awards, and one of the most cited authors in management. She was the 14th Editor of the Academy of Management Journal, founding and current editor‐in‐chief of Management and Organization Review, the 67th President of the Academy of Management, and Founding President of the International Association for Chinese Management Research. Her recent publications include research articles on CEO values, employment relationships, and social networks, the revised edition of Empirical Research Methods in Management and Organization Research, and a new book titled “In Search of Truth and Beauty: A Research Journal of Anne S. Tsui” (Peking University Press, 2012).

主题报告2 （英文）

报告人：Professor Michael G. Pratt （当今案例研究的顶尖学者之一）

题目: “The Sparrow May Be Small…”: Deep Learning from Longitudinal Case Studies within Single Contexts

摘要Abstract： Often in pursuit of strengthening generalizability, researchers are encouraged to do multiple cases across multiple contexts. However, there is much to be gained by staying with a single context over long periods of time ‐‐ whether one is conducting one or more “cases” within that context. I will draw upon my own research on Amway distributors, medical residents, and firefighters, in addition to the research of others, to show the advantages of single‐context longitudinal studies. Such advantages include, but are not limited to: (a) increased trust by those we study; (b) high quality data; (c) deep and subtle learning; and even (d) different forms of generalization. Ultimately, I will argue that these studies are both highly fruitful and have the potential to strongly impact the field.

报告人简介Biography： Michael G. Pratt is the O’Connor Family Professor in the Management and Organization Department in the Carroll School of Management at Boston College, as well as a Fellow in the Winston Center for Leadership and Ethics. He earned his Ph.D. in Organizational Psychology from the University of Michigan. His research is problem‐centered and process‐oriented, and consequently he tends to engage in cross‐level research. His interests include how individuals connect with the work that they do, as well as to the organizations and professions /occupations in which they find themselves. Theoretically, his research draws heavily from theories of identity and identification, meaning, emotion, intuition, and culture (e.g., artifacts). Methodologically, his work is often inductive and qualitative in nature. He has published in the top journals in the field, including the Administrative Science Quarterly, Academy of Management Journal and the Academy of Management Review; and has been named one of the most influential scholars in management. He is the outgoing inaugural qualitative methods associate editor at the Academy of Management Journal, and was a recipient of the 2007 Best Paper Award for the Academy of Management Review (with Erik Dane).

主题报告3 （中文）

报告人：陈眧全教授

题目：Qualitative Methods and Content Analysis

摘要Abstract： In this presentation, I first go through major distinctions between qualitative and quantitative research paradigms. I then identify major approaches of content analysis as part of qualitative research and discuss advantages and limitations of content analysis. Furthermore, three journal publications are used to illustrate major issues involved in content analysis. Finally, I will walk you through specific steps, techniques, and tactics of conducting contact analysis. In small groups, participants will have opportunities to discuss issues of their interest and develop a plan for a study that involves content analysis.

报告人简介Biography： Chao Chuan Chen is full professor of organization management and global business, the president of IACMR, and the Dean of Nanjing University School of Business in charge of internationalization of faculty, research, and teaching. He published articles in premier journals including the Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Administrative Science Quarterly, Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Science, and Journal of International Business Studies. He used content analysis to explore images of business leaders in the popular press and the meanings of harmony in organizations. His current research interests include business ethics, the cultural value of universalismparticularism, guanxi and social networking.

主题报告4 （英文）

报告人： Professor Chris Smith

题目：The limitations of Interpretive Case Study Research and growing interest in Critical Realism as a basis for Case Study Research

摘要Abstract： The presentation will review the growing interest in Critical Realism as a philosophical approach to research, and the implications this has for case study research. The presentation will examine the discursive and interpretivist tradition in case study research (especially with the European tradition), and the limitations of this approach for grasping a rounded view of a topic – where causal reality is not always explicit at the level of the empirical or within actual events. It will then examine the growing interest in Critical Realism from a concern to provide a coherent basis for rejecting the usual polarisation of methodological debate between positivistic survey methodology and interpretivist ethnographic research. Some examples of CR and case study research will be discussed, including Elger and Smith Assembling Work: Remaking Factory Regimes in Japanese Multinationals in Britain (OUP 2005).

报告人简介Biography： Chris Smith is Professor of Organisation Studies and Comparative Management, School of Management, Royal Holloway University of London. His research interests are in labour process theory, knowledge transfer through the transnational firm, comparative analysis of work and employment and professional labour. He has won awards for papers on theory development in the area of comparative organisation and labour process analysis. He has conducted in‐depth single case studies in the food industry and aerospace; and comparative case studies in textiles, and tele‐health care; and multiple case studies in Japanese manufacturing firms operating abroad. He has conducted fieldwork in the UK, China, Australia, Mexico and Brazil. He has held visiting positions at Universities in Australia, Brazil and Hong Kong. He is currently researching the organization of human resource management and the labour process in Chinese factories and the Chinese Business Model abroad. He has been active in the International Labour Process Conference for many years. Recent book publications include: Assembling Work: Remaking Factory Regimes in Japanese Multinationals in Britain with Tony Elger (Oxford University Press, 2005); Remaking Management: Between Global and Local with Brendan McSweeney and Robert Fitzgerald (Cambridge University Press, 2008); Creative Labour –Working in the Creative Industries with Alan Mckinlay, (Palgrave, 2009); and Working Life: Renewing Labour Process Analysis with Paul Thompson (Palgrave, 2010).

案例研究工作坊1（英文）

题目：Designing and Publishing Qualitative Case Studies

报告人： Professor Michael G. Pratt

摘要Abstract： While researchers are often encouraged to do longitudinal studies, the thought of doing longitudinal case studies – especially qualitative studies – may seem like a daunting task. However, the rewards (intellectual, career, and more) of such research projects are tremendous. In this tutorial, I will discuss the design of such studies, including the need to “design for drift.” In addition, I will discuss how to manage longitudinal studies within one’s larger research pipeline/ portfolio, and give suggestions for how to write‐up and publish these studies.

案例研究工作坊2（中文）

题目：Qualitative Methods and Content Analysis

报告人：陈眧全教授

摘要Abstract： In this presentation, I first go through major distinctions between qualitative and quantitative research paradigms. I then identify major approaches of content analysis as part of qualitative research and discuss advantages and limitations of content analysis. Furthermore, three journal publications are used to illustrate major issues involved in content analysis. Finally, I will walk you through specific steps, techniques, and tactics of conducting contact analysis. In small groups, participants will have opportunities to discuss issues of their interest and develop a plan for a study that involves content analysis.

案例研究工作坊3 （英文）

题目：Building Theory from Multiple Case Studies

报告人：Dr. Sam Garg （埃森哈特的学生）

摘要Abstract： This workshop aims to provide a comprehensive step‐by‐step process of building novel theories using the multiple case study approach. Several highly cited publications, as well as ongoing research, will be used to illustrate the use of this method. Key challenges faced in the publication process of multiple case study research will also be addressed.

报告人简介Biography： Sam Garg (samgarg@ust.hk) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Management at HKUST, Hong Kong, and a former student of Kathy Eisenhardt. He obtained his PhD (Organizations, Strategy and Entrepreneurship) and MA (Sociology) from Stanford University. Sam’s research interests are in issues at the intersection of entrepreneurship, strategy, and organizational behavior. His specific interests include corporate governance, strategic decision making, power dynamics, and cognition in entrepreneurial firms and international businesses. He is currently investigating CEO‐Board relationship using a real‐time, longitudinal multiple case study approach. His other recent work has been published (or is forthcoming) in the Academy of Management Review and the Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. He is also a co‐author of “Inspire to Innovate: Management and Innovation in Asia”, a book based on several mini case studies and a survey.

案例研究工作坊4 （英文）

题目：Using Critical Realism and Multiple case–studies

报告人：Professor Chris Smith

摘要Abstract： The tutorial will look at different approaches to theory in case study research, and especially the implications of Critical Realism. It will draw from case study research on HR and work organisation of Japanese MNCs in the UK. The first implication of critical realism (but also of some other approaches to case‐study research) is that explicit theorising about relations, processes and contexts is intrinsic to the conduct of such research. In this regard Elger and Smith (2005) research drew explicitly on the ‘System, Society and Dominance’ framework (Smith and Meiksins, 1995; Smith, 2008) to identify distinctive sources of constraint and enablement within our case‐studies. The second implication of critical realism concerns the status of multiple case studies, especially the scope for redrawing the boundaries between cases and contexts by tracing connections between mechanisms identified in linked cases or cases that share a common setting. Thirdly, the implications of critical realism for the collection and interpretation of data itself, and especially for the eliciting and analysis of participants’ accounts will be discussed. This exposes tensions between seeking to address the researcher’s analytical agenda and giving voice to participants; provides a justification for an explicitly iterative approach to interviewing multiple informants sharing the same setting; and highlights the centrality of a critical engagement with the strengths and limitations of actors’ accounts.